Objectives of Quality Control Policies:
• Mission Statement: We aim to maintain highest possible Standards of objectivity, independence, integrity, confidentiality, and professional conduct with a practical approach. Quality of service is maintained under all costs and circumstances.
• Skills & competence: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Jhunjhunwala, Partner, is in practice for last Thirteen Years. The skills are upgraded by attending various Professional & Self Improvement courses and relevant literature. We also try to enrich our experience by networking with a cross section of competent persons with high moral standards and a practical bias. Man Power is drawn from students pursuing the CA course based on Assignments. The selection process of our candidates is based on academic knowledge and skills tested through interview. Any material deviation from standards leads to counseling and if required swift termination. The Partners believe in maximum possible delegation without diluting professional standards. Detailed briefing and hands on supervision ensures timely completion of assignments with acceptable quality standards.
• Assignment: Skills are matched with job requirement.
• Delegation: Dynamic direction, supervision and review at appropriate levels ensure acceptable quality standards.
• Consultation: Real time consultation ensures strategic inputs are available to maintain output quality.
• Acceptance and Retention of Clients: Harmony with Clients without compromising on output is the principal goal.
• Monitoring: Real time review ensures timely detection and correction of deviation.
Individual Audits:
• Direction, Supervision and Review of Assistants’ Capacity: In pre delegation review, Assistants are briefed about the responsibility, objectives of procedures and possible accounting and auditing problems affecting the nature, timing and extent of audit procedure, audit program, time, budget and overall audit plan.
• Supervision: Real time monitoring prevents any mismatch between depth of resources and expected outcome. Based of significance of audit and accounting issues, adjustment to audit plan & program is made, difference of professional judgement is resolved and suitability of consultation level is evaluated.
• Review: Reviewer is at least equally competent to the person whose work is under review. Performance is matched with programme. Significant audit issues are either satisfactorily resolved or are reflected in audit conclusion. The extent of attainment of audit objectives is ascertained.
• Conclusions: Conclusions derived must support the audit opinion and should be consistent with the audit results.
Objects of Review:
The overall audit plan and programme is modified based on the assessment of inherent and control risks supported by required tests.
Documentation of the conclusions derived from the result of consultation and audit evidence obtained from substantive procedures are evaluated.
Financial Statements, Proposed Report and Adjustments based on audit findings are evaluated.
Audit personnel declare their lack of personal interest.